> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://cortex-docs.paloaltonetworks.com/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://cortex-docs.paloaltonetworks.com/analytics-alerts/alerts-by-name/suspicious-dkim-result.md).

# Suspicious DKIM Result

### Synopsis

| Field                | Value                                         |
| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| Activation Period    | 14 Days                                       |
| Training Period      | 30 Days                                       |
| Test Period          | N/A (single event)                            |
| Deduplication Period | 1 Day                                         |
| Required Data        | Microsoft 365 Emails                          |
| Detection Modules    | Email                                         |
| Detector Tags        | Spoofing                                      |
| ATT\&CK Tactic       | Stealth (TA0005)                              |
| ATT\&CK Technique    | Social Engineering: Impersonation (T1684.001) |
| Severity             | Informational                                 |

### Description

The email contains a suspicious DKIM entry, showing either an unexpected verification result (none, fail, or policy) or a mismatched signing domain, which may indicate potential tampering or spoofing activity.

### Attacker's Goals

Impersonate internal users or familiar individuals and trick them into clicking on malicious links or attachments.

### Investigative actions

* Check the email address for any unusual spellings, missing letters, or unknown domains.
* Examine the sender's IP address and reputation, and check why DKIM didn't pass.
* Verify whether the sender's IP address has appeared in different log sources before, and if it is recognizable.
* If the message contains attachments or links, scrutinize them for any suspicious indications.
* Monitor further actions taken, such as file downloads or access to potentially malicious links.

### Variations

<details>

<summary>Known domain DKIM deviation</summary>

**Synopsis**

| Field             | Value                                         |
| ----------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| ATT\&CK Tactic    | Stealth (TA0005)                              |
| ATT\&CK Technique | Social Engineering: Impersonation (T1684.001) |
| Severity          | Informational                                 |

**Description**

* An email was sent from a commonly seen domain in the organization, that has historically passed DKIM checks, but returned a suspicious DKIM result of fail
* This deviation may indicate an attempt to spoof or impersonate a legitimate external sender.
* Such sudden DKIM outcome from a previously trusted external domain warrants further investigation.

**Attacker's Goals**

Impersonate internal users or familiar individuals and trick them into clicking on malicious links or attachments.

**Investigative actions**

* Check the email address for any unusual spellings, missing letters, or unknown domains.
* Examine the sender's IP address and reputation, and check why DKIM didn't pass.
* Verify whether the sender's IP address has appeared in different log sources before, and if it is recognizable.
* If the message contains attachments or links, scrutinize them for any suspicious indications.
* Monitor further actions taken, such as file downloads or access to potentially malicious links.

</details>

<details>

<summary>Lack DKIM signature from typically signing domains</summary>

**Synopsis**

| Field             | Value                                         |
| ----------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| ATT\&CK Tactic    | Stealth (TA0005)                              |
| ATT\&CK Technique | Social Engineering: Impersonation (T1684.001) |
| Severity          | Informational                                 |

**Description**

* An email was sent from a domain that has historically passed DKIM checks, but returned a suspicious DKIM result of none
* A none DKIM result implies on an unsigned email, which is atypical for domains with previous signed messages.
* This deviation may indicate an attempt to spoof or impersonate a legitimate external sender.
* Such sudden DKIM outcome from a previously trusted external domain warrants further investigation.

**Attacker's Goals**

Impersonate internal users or familiar individuals and trick them into clicking on malicious links or attachments.

**Investigative actions**

* Check the email address for any unusual spellings, missing letters, or unknown domains.
* Examine the sender's IP address and reputation, and check why DKIM didn't pass.
* Verify whether the sender's IP address has appeared in different log sources before, and if it is recognizable.
* If the message contains attachments or links, scrutinize them for any suspicious indications.
* Monitor further actions taken, such as file downloads or access to potentially malicious links.

</details>

<details>

<summary>DKIM results lacking sender correlation</summary>

**Synopsis**

| Field             | Value                                         |
| ----------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| ATT\&CK Tactic    | Stealth (TA0005)                              |
| ATT\&CK Technique | Social Engineering: Impersonation (T1684.001) |
| Severity          | Informational                                 |

**Description**

* The email's authentication results have no indication of proper signing from the email's sender
* This deviation may indicate an attempt to spoof or impersonate a legitimate external sender.

**Attacker's Goals**

Impersonate internal users or familiar individuals and trick them into clicking on malicious links or attachments.

**Investigative actions**

* Check the email address for any unusual spellings, missing letters, or unknown domains.
* Examine the sender's IP address and reputation, and check why DKIM didn't pass.
* Verify whether the sender's IP address has appeared in different log sources before, and if it is recognizable.
* If the message contains attachments or links, scrutinize them for any suspicious indications.
* Monitor further actions taken, such as file downloads or access to potentially malicious links.

</details>

<details>

<summary>Known domain suspicious DKIM result</summary>

**Synopsis**

| Field             | Value                                         |
| ----------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| ATT\&CK Tactic    | Stealth (TA0005)                              |
| ATT\&CK Technique | Social Engineering: Impersonation (T1684.001) |
| Severity          | Informational                                 |

**Description**

* An email was sent from a commonly seen domain that had no other suspicious DKIM outcomes for the past 30 days.
* This may indicate an attempt to spoof or impersonate a legitimate external sender.

**Attacker's Goals**

Impersonate internal users or familiar individuals and trick them into clicking on malicious links or attachments.

**Investigative actions**

* Check the email address for any unusual spellings, missing letters, or unknown domains.
* Examine the sender's IP address and reputation, and check why DKIM didn't pass.
* Verify whether the sender's IP address has appeared in different log sources before, and if it is recognizable.
* If the message contains attachments or links, scrutinize them for any suspicious indications.
* Monitor further actions taken, such as file downloads or access to potentially malicious links.

</details>


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the following URL with the `ask` and `goal` query parameters:

```
GET https://cortex-docs.paloaltonetworks.com/analytics-alerts/alerts-by-name/suspicious-dkim-result.md?ask=<question>&goal=<user_goal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is what the user is ultimately trying to achieve, the reason they need the answer. Sharing it helps GitBook give you a better, more relevant answer. A goal is most helpful when it describes the outcome the user wants rather than restating the question. For example, with `ask=how do I create an API token`, a goal like `automate deployments from our CI pipeline` lets GitBook tailor the answer to that use case.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
